Creatives gathered at the ACT | UJ Arts & Culture
Conference on Creative Currencies: Accessing Opportunities in an Expanding
Marketplace to be informed and inspired, but most of all to extend their
various networks.
The three-day conference, which was presented by the Arts
& Culture Trust (ACT) and UJ Arts & Culture (University of
Johannesburg) in partnership with the European Union, The British Council,
EUNIC, Visual Arts Network of South Africa (VANSA) and Arterial Network South
Africa; drew together members of the creative sector from Europe and the
continent to engage around pertinent topics including policy and the digital
frontier.
MC, Mike van Graan, drew together some key thoughts from the
proceedings, bringing the conference to a close:
“And so, we come to the end of the second ACT |UJ
conference, with this year’s theme: Creative
Currencies: Accessing Opportunities in an Expanding Market Place having
shaped our discourse.
-
We have been inspired by visionary social
entrepreneurs, leaders of world class events, who have affirmed the rich
potential of our arts, culture and heritage sector.
-
We have been informed and challenged by research
showing declining global north markets, expanding African markets and a
negligible South African market for African creative goods and services.
-
We have been thrilled by the ambitions and
vision of young go-getters who make things happen, without feeling entitled to
assistance from anyone, or being dependent on others to make it happen.
-
We have been humbled by the innovation and
creativity of social and cultural entrepreneurs from countries with much less
than we have.
-
We have been stimulated by the possibilities of
technology, of new media in building, sustaining and expanding our markets, but
also to entertain and to generate income.
-
We have been frustrated a little by the blah of
some of our national departments, but have been energized by the practical
programmes of local government.
-
We have been pointed to the unfolding thinking
in international, global north contexts, and have been reminded of the polarity
of our world and of our own country where many on the underside of history also
have a right to enjoy the arts and participate in the cultural life of the
community, but do not do so as yet.
-
We have been frustrated by the limitations of
policy development and implementation, and the defining of value within the
sector simply by Rands, cents and political imperatives of job creation.
-
We have been moved by stories of substantial
transformation, of people’s lives being changed through the provision of
opportunities, less because of government directives, and more because of a
recognition on the part of leadership within some institutions that it is the
right, the moral thing to do.
-
We have sighed deeply as again we’ve recognized
that if only we could match visionary policy and public sector funding with the
passion and expertise within the sector, we could achieve exponentially more.
-
We have been shown how it is not only possible,
but indeed necessary to get on with our creative lives and endeavours, despite
poor policy implementation and despite the absence or arbitrary nature of
public funding.
-
We have networked, connected, exchanged business
cards.
-
We have been entertained, even been moved by the
UJ performances.
We would all have been impacted differently, and have
varying ideas about where we go from here, but if I were to select a few
practical “way forward” things, arising out of the last three days, then - in
no particular order, they would be the following:
1. There is a major need for research:
- Research to gather data on the creative industries and
their contribution not only to employment and local and national GDPs, but also
to social development
- Research into international opportunities like the
Frankfurt Book Fair to project our creative goods and services globally
- Research into how many people are employed in all aspects
of the value chain: education, creation, production, distribution and
consumption – in all sectors of the creative industries: music, dance, film,
design, etc
- Research into funding channels to support the creative
sector and research into the impact of funding to promote the sector
- Research into the best policies and strategies to enhance
product development and distribution
- Databases of festivals and events in our country
- Databases of cultural entrepreneurs and creative
enterprises working in different spheres
- Databases of audiences, the demographics of markets for
different creative products and the best strategies to reach them
- Research into not only demographic, but substantial
transformation within and through the arts, culture and heritage sector
Of course, this research needs to be made available in an
accessible, regular way to the arts sector.
For this, we need to get the proposed Cultural Observatory
off the ground or to engage a higher learning institution to take on this role.
2. There is a need to educate government, those responsible
for arts and culture policy and implementation. Politicians and officials at
national, provincial and local levels need to attend an annual two-day event
where the kinds of presentations made here during the last three days can show
them the social, economic, human development, image-building potential of the
sector so that they are inspired, so that they understand the sector better and
so that there is greater cooperation as befits a democracy, rather than the
parallel universes that currently exist.
3. Local government is the public sector level closest to
the citizenry. There should be an annual meeting of the 10-15 leading cities in
our country to engage with each other, sharing ideas, but also constructively
competing with each other to be, not necessarily in name, but in practice, the
‘cultural capital’ of the country. Perhaps we should indeed have a rotating
cultural capital each year, with cities vying for this title on the basis of
their investment in the creative sector and their proposed programme of
activities for a given year.
4. We have some great leaders in the creative sector, and we
simply do not engage them enough in developing new tiers of leadership. We
should identify younger people with potential and devise mentorship programmes
in which they shadow the likes of Tony Lankester, Brett Pyper and Ravi Naidoo
and at least 20-30 others, over 12-24 months, learning from them, learning by
doing.
5. We have them, but we need to increase the number, range
and quality of courses providing business acumen, entrepreneurial, marketing
skills. These can be stand-alone courses, but should also be integrated into
existing degree courses, perhaps as an honours degree or as a post-degree
diploma.
6. We need – as a country – to pay better attention to our
role on the continent lest we increase the perception of South Africa as the
USA of Africa, exporting our creative goods and media across the continent and
infusing consumers with our worldviews, our values, our ideas. We need to
revisit the UNESCO 2005 Convention and the AU Plan of Action on Cultural
Industries that we have signed up to, and now need to make a reality of
building regional markets for African creative goods and services. Those
interested should join Arterial Network in helping to do this as a pan-African
civil society movement, and participate in the African Creative Economy
conference that will take place in Cape Town from October 6 to 9. We should be
building joint ventures not only with northern counterparts but with African
creatives, too.
7. We need to engage more actively with technology, perhaps
creating new apps to develop and sustain markets, to communicate our brands, to
source funding. Again, we have them, but we need to increase the number and
range of courses offering expertise in the use of cellphone and social media
technology.
8. There is a greater need for co-ordination – a lot of
excellent activities happen in silos. Better synergies, economies of scale and
upscaling of events and activities could occur through coordination not only
within particular groupings such as festivals and events, cities, theatres,
etc, but also between these.
9. There is a need to get our policies right so that we get
our strategies and funding mechanisms right too. We need to accept the broad
continuum of artistic practice that includes artistic endeavour for its own
sake, artistic endeavour for socially-good ends and artistic activity for
commercial gain, each requiring different strategies and funding forms, rather
than adopt a one-size fits all approach.
10. Finally, there is a need for more of these kinds of
forums. I know many are tired of talking want to get on with doing, and that’s
to be encouraged. But it is less for the talking that these forums are
important sometimes, than for the networking that happens, for the partnerships
that are built and the new work that emerges out these events.
Of course, the question is, who should do this? As a start,
we should leave this with the organisers of this event – the University of
Johannesburg and the Arts & Culture Trust, as well as their partners –
VANSA, Arterial Network SA, and a range of international partners, so that we
see this not simply as an annual event, but an event that sparks meaningful
interventions through the course of the year, in much the same way that spoke
about festivals and other events having an impact far beyond the short times in
which they take place.
You may have other ideas, and we would welcome them. This,
after all, is about us taking responsibility for our sector and for our
creative lives.”
Conference presentations are available for download at http://www.act.org.za/programmes_conference_archive.htm?yearArchive=2013&category=Conference.
The ‘Creative Currencies’ conference was supported by the
Cultural Development Trust, Santam, Business and Arts South Africa (BASA),
SAMRO Foundation, Distell Foundation and media partners, Mail & Guardian,
SAfm, Classicfeel Magazine and Pink Room Productions.