An overwrought piece of work that insists
on projecting the cinematic equivalent of screaming headlines to illustrate its
thoroughly disputable “insights”. (Review: Patrick Compton - 1/10)
Writer-director Darren Aronofski’s latest
film is not just a disaster, it may even be certifiable. A screechy, hysterical
Freudian nightmare about an egocentric poet and his wife, it’s in every sense a
horror show.
A critic has written that if you gave a
pretentious adolescent strange herbs to smoke and put $40 million in his
pocket, you might end up with Mother! That’s about right. This is an
overwrought piece of work that insists on projecting the cinematic equivalent
of screaming headlines to illustrate its thoroughly disputable “insights”. By
the end of an increasingly jagged, not to mention interminable two hours, you
will beg for a long lie-down in a dark, quiet room.
Aronofski, who has acquired a dubious cult
status with movies such as Requiem for a
Dream, Black Swan, The Wrestler and Noah,
has thrown together the stylistic ingredients of haunted house horror and
Freudian drama and emerged with a mix that is uniquely his own.
The movie is shot (largely in
claustrophobic close-up) from the point of view of a young woman (Jennifer
Lawrence) who is married to a famous older poet (Javier Bardem). They live in
solitude in the poet’s house in the country. As she beavers away renovating the
place, he struggles with writer’s bloc and a loss of eros. She is anxious,
understandably so as he is clearly more interested in himself, his work and his
reputation than he is in her.
This state of affairs is underlined when
the house is invaded by a creepy surgeon and his wife (Ed Harris and Michelle
Pfeiffer) who are not only tolerated by the poet, but actively encouraged to
move in, largely to stroke his ego. Their intrusive behaviour becomes
increasingly unbearable, climaxing in a shocking, bloody, domestic explosion.
At this stage we may feel that the
thoroughly alienated and traumatised wife should get the hell out of the house,
and the relationship. Her feelings of neurotic disquiet are briefly stilled,
however, when she discovers she is pregnant. The film then cuts to months later
when she is expecting the birth of her child.
Hard though it may be to believe, the
movie’s first half can retrospectively be seen as the calm before the storm as
it now builds up a final head of steam which pitches us into a grotesque
freakshow that finally gets down to the heart of the matter.
What is the movie all about? Amidst all the
madness, we are told that relationships demand a woman’s extreme emotional and
physical sacrifice – without end. As Pfeiffer’s character puts it: “You give
and you give and you give, and it’s never enough.”
Aronofski addicts will doubtless demur, but
even if you share the writer-director’s spectacularly dark, simplistic views
about the relations between the sexes, it would be hard not to be put off by
his method of showing it. For all the visually arresting images, particularly
during the horrific climax, Aronofski’s vision carries a depressingly
superficial, almost adolescent edge.
Mother! opens in Durban on Friday, November 10.- Patrick Compton