national Arts Festival Banner

Sunday, July 20, 2014

CULTIVATING AUDIENCES FOR THE FUTURE



by Pieter Jacobs, ACT CEO

(The following article is made available in arrangement with the Arts & Culture Trust (ACT) and the Dramatic, Artistic and Literary Rights Organisation (DALRO). See ACT’s website http://www.act.org.za/)

When it comes to the implementation of audience development, it is all too easy to resort to bussing in underprivileged children from who knows where. Unless this is part of a holistic programme which also addresses other crucial factors, such as motivation and opportunity to attend or participate, one can’t but wonder whether it isn’t simply an attempt to fulfil a short-term need to get bums on seats. Providing access (ability) to attend is only one part of audience development.

It becomes a concern when at the Arts & Culture Trust (ACT) we receive countless applications from arts organisations interested in growing their audiences (market) by doing just that. Most often by targeting the youth in locations that doesn’t make sense at all.

ACT is passionate about this area of development but also realises that there aren’t enough funds to shoot and miss.

In 2001, the RAND Corporation published an extremely useful resource A New Framework for Building Participation in the Arts, which highlights motivation, ability and opportunity to attend as the three main considerations when devising an audience development programme. Mia Stokmans from Tilburg University’s paper, Model of Audience Development: Some Theoretical Elaborations and Practical Consequences, also identifies these three aspects as vital to the success of audience development.

As could be expected, there are some challenges when it comes to the implementation of audience development models. Jennifer Wiggins, at University of Wisconsin-Madison, interrogated some of the challenges associated with the RAND model in her paper, Motivation, Ability, and Opportunity to Participate. The RAND Corporation also published research Cultivating demand for the arts commissioned by the Wallace Foundation, which highlights arts education as a priority when attempting to increase demand for artistic work. The state of, especially, arts education in the public school curriculum as described in the research, is similar to the situation locally.

The Newcastlegateshead Cultural Venues worked with Morris Hargreaves McIntyre (MHM) to develop new ways of understanding and thinking about audiences. The MHM-NGCV Levels of Engagement Model was developed in 2010 is also a notable resource. This and MHM’s Culture Segments have been tested through a series of research projects (please see the bottom of blog post for links to sources).

While some arts institutions, artists and organisations may be able to increase demand, enable access and supply valued arts products and experiences to a growing market, the underlying issue of which declining audiences and consumption of the arts are symptomatic, is an industry-wide challenge. I have no doubt that great advances could be made if a unified arts community, the Department of Arts and Culture and the Department of Education, could systematically work together to address this issue.

‘Well that’s just great!’ right? Where does this leave the artists, arts institutions and organisations in the meantime? I like to think in a place of massive opportunity. There are hundreds of thousands potential art lovers out there. It is our challenge to learn to know them and understand what makes them tick.

Below are sources and additional resources; please feel free to add others in the comments section:




Model of Audience Development: Some Theoretical Elaborations and Practical Consequences: http://neumann.hec.ca/aimac2005/PDF_Text/Stockmans_Mia.pdf